A recent study published in the journal Matter highlights the need to rethink how scientific contributions are evaluated to ensure that research serves society effectively and remains a trusted source of knowledge. The article, titled Science and Freedom: Upholding Integrity Across Disciplines to Restore Public Trust, is authored by Carina I. C. Crucho, researcher at the Nanomedicine research lab at UCIBIO-NOVA.
In this perspective piece, the author reflects on the growing pressures of the "publish-or-perish" culture, where the focus on quantity over quality of scientific output is threatening research integrity. According to Carina I. C. Crucho, current evaluation systems based on metrics like publication numbers and citation counts often undermine originality and collaboration, which are essential for scientific progress and public trust.
Drawing from her experience as a chemist and inspired by the Portuguese Carnation Revolution, the author advocates for a cultural shift in academia, grounded in freedom, honesty, and collaboration. The study proposes concrete solutions, such as prioritizing peer evaluations, improving citation practices, and rewarding quality over quantity in both publications and mentorship.
The author emphasizes that restoring scientific integrity is key to supporting evidence-based policy and addressing global challenges.
Original article:
Science and freedom: Upholding integrity across disciplines to restore public trust
Carina I.C. Crucho, Matter, Volume 8, Issue 3, 2025